Imaging Techniques Cell Culture

scientificprotocols authored over 7 years ago

Authors: Carol Heckman, Sucheta Kanagasundaram, Marilyn Cayer & Jong Paige 


Researchers whose work focuses on self-assembled structures in the biological sciences or nanostructures in the materials sciences are interested in high-resolution imaging. Certain self-assembled structures occupy a size range where the theoretical limit of resolution by light microscopy (LM), which is on the order of 160 nm, is not adequate to image them. The cell creates several types of protrusions. The filopodium (plural, filopodia) is a slender, tapering extension of cytoplasm with a mean width of 50-100 nm. Filopodia are especially challenging to visualize, because they may broaden to >160 nm at the base where they integrate with the rest of the cytoplasm. Although the broader parts of the structures are often used to estimate the prevalence of filopodia on cells, the greatest number of the structures may be missing from the image viewed by LM. Thus, LM imaging gives inaccurate and misleading results. To accurately assess their prevalence, filopodia must be imaged with a high-resolution instrument or modality. The filopodia serve as only one example of a cell surface structure that is at or beyond the LM limit. Additional features, such as microvilli, coated pits, caveolae, and stereocilia, use self-assembly processes to create structures in the sub-LM range.


  1. 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at 37 degrees C
  2. 0.1 M phosphate buffer or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.3
  3. 1% OsO4
  4. 1% carbohydrazide
  5. Distilled or deionized water
  6. Graded series of ethanol or hexylene glycol for dehydration
  7. Liquid carbon dioxide for critical point dryer


  1. One pair of small diagonal wire cutter
  2. Critical point dryer
  3. Sputter coater


  1. Pre-warm fixative solution to 37 degrees C.
  2. Remove media from plastic tissue culture dish and rapidly pour on glutaraldehyde fixative.
  3. Leave 15 minutes.
  4. Rinse with buffer or PBS three times over 5 minutes.
  5. Fix in OsO4, 15-30 minutes.
  6. Rinse with buffer five times over 10 minutes.
  7. Incubate in freshly made 1% carbohydrazide 10-30 minutes.
  8. Rinse with distilled five times over 15 minutes.
  9. Incubate again in 1% OsO4, 15-30 minutes
  10. Rinse three times with distilled water over 15 minutes. In the third rinse, cut dishes to fit the critical point dryer. Using small diagonal wire cutters, clip and remove edge first. Then cut bottom of dish to size.
  11. Place in another dish.
  12. Dehydrate through ethanol or hexylene glycol series beginning with 30% and changing to solutions of 50%, 70%, 90%, and three times 100%, over 30 minutes.
  13. Dry in critical point dryer.
  14. Sputter coat with 1-2 nm gold-palladium.


4-5 hours

Critical Steps

1.) The major protrusions have been found to retract if the temperature of the fixative differs from that of the cells (see Table 1). Thus, prewarmed fixative and its rapid addition to the cell culture while it is still warm are essential.

7-9.) Repeating the OsO4 exposure after a carbohydrazide step adds more reduced osmium to cellular details and increases the sample conductivity (references 1-3). Carbohydrazide is substituted for the compound used by the workers who originally defined this procedure (reference 4). The conductivity can be increased later in the procedure by using thicker coats of noble metal, but these obscure the details of the cell edge.


1.) To conserve shape conformation of mammalian cells, fixative temperature must be the same as the cells’ (37 degrees C).

10.) Do not let cells dry out at any time. This exerts huge surface tension forces and collapses the structure. Samples are especially vulnerable during steps where they are cut.

12.) The samples are also vulnerable to air-drying during transfer to the critical point dryer. Hexylene glycol is not volatile. This makes it better than ethanol to avoid air-drying.

14.) Thick coatings (3 nm or greater) will obscure edge details.

Anticipated Results

High resolution surface and edge detail, useful for evaluating the prevalence of filopodia and other cellular surface details.


  1. Heckman, C.A., K.I. Oravecz, D. Schwab, and J. Pontén. Ruffling and locomotion: Role in cell resistance to growth factor-induced proliferation. J. Cell. Phys. 154:554-565, 1993.
  2. Heckman, C.A., H.K. Plummer III, and C.S. Runyeon. Persistent effects of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA): Possible implication of vesicle traffic. J. Cell. Phys. 166:217-230, 1996.
  3. Heckman, C.A., J.M. Urban, M.L. Cayer, Y. Li, N. Boudreau, J. Barnes, H.K. Plummer, III, C. Hall, R. Kozma, and L. Lim. Novel p21-activated kinase-dependent protrusions characteristically formed at the edge of transformed cells. Exp. Cell Res. 295: 432-447, 2004.
  4. Malick, L.E., and Wilson, R.B. Modified thiocarbohydrazide procedure for scanning electron microscopy: routine use for normal, pathological or experimental tissues. Stain Technol. 50:265-269, 1975.


Table 1. Major protrusions are affected by temperature difference between sample and fixative.

Download Table 1.

THP1 monocytic cells were adhered on fibrinogen matrix and primed with 100 ng/mL of GM-CSF overnight at 37 degrees C. Further information on the THP1 cells can be found elsewhere (Kanagasundaram, submitted for publication). The cells were fixed with 3% formaldehyde made fresh from paraformaldehyde in PBS. Sample A was equilibrated to room temperature and exposed to fixative solution that was also at room temperature. Sample B was also exposed to fixative solution at room temperature but the cells were at 37 degrees C just before fixation. In sample C, both the sample and fixative were at 37 degrees C. Actin staining was done by introducing TRITC-conjugated phalloidin. The cells were imaged by confocal microscopy. The major protrusions were measured as described in reference 3.

Table 1

Author information

Carol Heckman, Marilyn Cayer & Jong Paige, Bowling Green State University

Sucheta Kanagasundaram, University of Singapore

Source: Protocol Exchange (2007) doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.504. Originally published online 13 November 2007.

Average rating 0 ratings