Authors: Manuel Théry and Matthieu Piel
This protocol describes a simple, fast, and efficient method for making adhesive micropatterns that can be used to control individual cell shape and adhesion patterns. It is based on the use of an elastomeric stamp containing microfeatures to print proteins on the substrate of choice. The process can be subdivided into three parts. First, a silicon master is fabricated, which contains the microfeatures of interest. Once fabricated, the master can be used multiple times to make stamps. Masters with customized patterns can also be purchased commercially. Second, a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stamp is fabricated. Unlike fabrication of the master, this step can be performed without specialized equipment. The PDMS stamp is inked with extracellular matrix proteins. Proteins are printed on a substrate (e.g., a tissue culture polystyrene dish or a glass coverslip covered with a thin layer of polystyrene). The nonprinted areas are back-filled with poly-L-lysine-polyethylene glycol, which renders them resistant to cell adhesion. The production of these micropatterned substrates can be completed in <2 h. The third and final portion of the protocol describes the deposition of cells onto the micropatterned substrate.
Movie 1 illustrates many of the steps for performing microcontact printing as described in this protocol.
Movie 1. A step-by-step illustration of preparation of an elastomeric stamp containing microfeatures, preparation of the substrate, and cell growth on the microfeatures. (Movie created by Nicolas Carpi.)
Fabrication of the Master
This part requires specialized equipment and training; thus, it is best to fabricate the master in collaboration with a nanofabrication facility. However, a relatively simple lithography facility can be set up under a chemical hood. Fabrication of a master need only be done once, because it can be reused indefinitely to produce the elastomeric stamps. The desired photoresist master can also be purchased from companies that fabricate custom-made microstructured masters on demand.
This protocol provides guidelines for the various parameters needed to fabricate a photoresist master. Details of this photolithography protocol, however, must be adapted to the specific needs of each laboratory (e.g., size of the microfeatures, distance between features, incubation times and temperatures). Note that the production of a master with microfeatures ranging from 1 μm to several hundred micrometers is a routine procedure in any microfabrication facility. The example in this protocol is best suited for features with a minimum dimension of 3-10 μm (but up to several tens of micrometers is okay) and a distance between features of <50 μm. Figure 1 provides an illustration of the steps required to fabricate a photoresist master.
Figure 1. The steps involved in producing molds by photolithography. (Circled numbers correspond to numbered steps in the Method.)
Photoresist Layer Coating
4.Place the photoresist layer and the optical mask into contact with one another on the mask aligner or on the custom-made vacuum mask holder. Illuminate with the UV lamp (UV power 45 mW/cm2 at 365 nm) for 10 sec.
5.Dilute the stock developer using one part developer and four parts H2O. Develop the photoresist in diluted developer for 90-120 sec. Rinse the wafer in a distilled H2O bath, which stops the development process. Dry the resist master with a flow of filtered air.
Photoresist Master Surface Coating
6.Silanize the resist master in order to prevent it from adhering to the PDMS during stamp fabrication.
7.Place the resist master for 30 min in a 70°C oven to complete the silanization.
Micropatterned Substrate Fabrication
Fabrication of the elastomeric stamp and microcontact printing of the micropattern can be performed in any biology laboratory without the need for specialized equipment. Two substrates for micropatterning are presented: the glass coverslip, which ensures the best optical quality, and the tissue culture treated polystyrene dish. Because in most cases protein adhesion is better on oxidized polystyrene than on glass, glass coverslips must be coated with a thin layer of polystyrene before protein and cells are applied. On bare glass, cells have been observed to rip adherent proteins, like fibronectin, off the glass.
See Figure 2 for an overview of PDMS stamp production.
Figure 2. PDMS stamp production.
8.Combine PDMS and the curing agent (both are included in the Sylgard 184 kit) in a 10:1 ratio in a plastic beaker and mix thoroughly using a plastic spoon, fork, or pipette. This step will generate bubbles in the elastomer.
9.Degas the PDMS mixture under vacuum to remove all of the air bubbles. Alternatively, centrifuge the mixture for 5 min at 3000 rpm.
10.Cast a 5-mm thick layer of degassed PDMS mixture onto the resist master. Cure it for 2 h in a 60°C oven.
11.Gently peel off the PDMS layer.
12.Using a microscope and transmitted light, locate the region of interest containing the desired micropattern geometries. With a scalpel, excise 1-cm2 stamps. Larger regions can be excised, but stamps larger than 1 cm2 are not easy to handle.
See Figure 3 for an overview of preparation of a polystyrene-coated glass coverslip.
Figure 3. Preparation of a polystyrene-coated glass coverslip.
The substrate described here is a glass coverslip coated with polystyrene. A tissue culture polystyrene dish can also be used. A short plasma or UV/ozone activation step (if the equipment is available) will enhance protein adhesion and cell attachment (Van Kooten et al. 2004). Proteins can be covalently bound to one another on polystyrene using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethyl aminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) (Grabarek and Gergely 1990). For a useful handbook on conjugation techniques, see Hermanson (2008).
13.Wash the glass coverslip with ethanol. Dry the coverslip with filtered air or let it dry in the hood.
14.Spin coat the coverslip as follows:
15.Coat with polystyrene as follows:
See Figure 4 for an overview of stamping fibronectin and backfilling with PLL-g-PEG.
Figure 4. Stamping fibronectin and backfilling with PLL-g-PEG.
16.Place a 20-μL drop of 50 μg/mL fibronectin in PBS onto the microstructured surface of a 1-cm2 stamp. Spread the fibronectin solution across the stamp surface with the tip of the pipette by moving it toward each corner of the stamp. Leave the inked stamp for ~30 min to allow the fibronectin to adsorb to the PDMS.
17.Transfer the polystyrene-coated coverslip (from Step 15) into a plasma cleaner. Turn on the pump to create a vacuum in the chamber. Allow a low flow of oxygen into the chamber and apply an oscillating electric field at 30 W for 10 sec.
18.Aspirate off the fibronectin drop and immediately add a large drop of PBS to the surface before it dries. Repeat the PBS wash two more times to remove all of the unadsorbed fibronectin.
19.Remove the PBS drop and let the stamp dry in the airflow of a hood (it will take from a few seconds up to 1 min). The stamp is ready for printing when the surface appears dry while looking at light reflecting from it. See Troubleshooting.
20.Grasp the dry stamp with tweezers, invert the stamp, and place the microstructured surface in contact with the activated substrate (from Step 17). Briefly apply gentle pressure with the tweezers to ensure good contact between the stamp and the substrate. Leave the stamp in contact with the substrate for 1 min.
21.Remove the stamp and immerse it into H2O in a 50-mL culture tube.
22.Prepare 0.1 mg/mL PLL-g-PEG solution in 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4). Immerse the printed substrate in this solution for 30 min. To minimize the amount of PLL-g-PEG used, place a 100-μL drop on the substrate and cover it with a piece of Parafilm.
23.During PLL-g-PEG adsorption, clean the stamp. Heat the culture tube containing the stamp at 60°C and sonicate it in an ultrasonic bath for 15 min. Then sonicate the stamp in ethanol for 15 min.
24.Dry the clean stamp under a hood for 1 h. Return the stamp to its storage container.
25.Wash the PLL-g-PEG-grafted substrate with PBS for 2 min and then for 10 min.
Micropatterned substrates prepared using this protocol have been used successfully with the following cells: HeLa-B, RPE1, MCF10A, MCF7, NIH3T3, HepaRG, MDCK, and human mesenchymal stem cells, as well as dendritic cells derived from murine bone marrow.
26.Wash adherent cells in PBS. Detach the cells with trypsin-EDTA (for 5-10 min, depending on the dilution used) or Versen EDTA.
27.Add complete culture medium to the flask and collect the cells by centrifugation for 3 min at 1500 rpm.
28.Remove the supernatant and resuspend the cells in complete culture medium at 50,000 cells/mL.
29.Add the cell solution to the micropatterned substrate (from Step 25). The final cell density should be ~10,000 cells/cm2. Place the cell-covered substrate into a tissue culture incubator.
30.Check the cells under a microscope to determine if a sufficiently large proportion of cells have attached to the micropatterns.
31.Remove unattached cells with a gentle flow of medium added to one side of the dish and aspirated from the other side.
32.Return the attached cells to the incubator. Let them spread fully (1-5 h, depending on the cell type).
33.Fix or video-record the cells.
See Figure 5 for examples of cells attached to micropatterns.
Figure 5. Images of cells on micropatterns. (Top) Fluorescently labeled fibronectin, (middle) HeLa cells under phase contrast, (bottom) overlay. (Right) Enlargements (2.5X) of cells shown in the images on the left. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Microfabrication techniques as applied to cell biology now have a long and successful history (see Folch and Toner  and Whitesides et al.  for reviews of many micropatterning techniques developed from the 1970s to the 1990s). Accompanying the rapid development of biological applications (in cell biology, tissue engineering, cell co-cultures, bioassays, and biosensors, among other fields), there has been a huge burst of technical papers in the last 10 years that expand the utility of micropatterning techniques to new substrates (glass, plastics, hydrogels, and elastomers), additional molecules, cell types, and into three dimensions.
There are many alternative techniques, but five main processes dominate the field of micropatterning:
Each method has drawbacks and advantages, so that the method chosen will depend upon the application. In a biology laboratory, independence from the expense and complexity of a specialized microfabrication facility may be a priority. Thus, photolithography and other stencil-type methods should be avoided. Although these methods provide patterns with very good spatial resolution and the methods are quite versatile, each substrate has to be made in a clean room using highly toxic chemicals. Laser beam and electron beam etching are rather easy to implement, provided that a microscopy facility is available with a dedicated microfabrication microscope. Although the method is versatile (the size and shape of features can be readily altered, and multiple patterns of different proteins can be generated), it is a slow method, producing low numbers of substrates having only very small areas covered with micropatterns. The same is true for nanoprinting, which is versatile but slow. Microprinting using regular printers requires very slow printing rates to achieve satisfactory spatial resolution.
Two methods are left for biologists wanting to do simple micropatterning: microcontact printing and UV-based chemistry. UV-based techniques often require special surface chemistry and photomasks, which can be expensive when very high resolution is required (at low resolution, only a transparency is needed). Both UV-based techniques and microcontact printing require specialized software to design the masks. For a recent contribution to UV-based techniques for two-dimensional surface micropatterning, see Azioune et al. (2009), which includes an introduction that reviews the field.
As shown in this protocol, with microcontact printing, once a photoresist master (a mold) is available to produce the stamps, no special equipment and no special chemistry is needed to produce the patterns. In addition, microcontact printing is well suited for generating features to control cell adhesion geometry and cell shape (i.e., patterns having minimal dimensions of several micrometers). It is also easy to implement in a cell biology laboratory. Microcontact printing can be applied to many types of substrates, although the quality of the patterns produced depends critically upon the quality of the contact between the stamp and the substrate. Microcontact printing is usually used to transfer molecules to a substrate, but it can also be used for etching (Kandere-Grzybowska et al. 2005). The transferred molecule can be used to bind other molecules, such as cell adhesion molecules, or can itself be a cell adhesion molecule. Alternatively, the transferred molecule can be a protein- or cell-repelling molecule, like polyethylene oxide. Microcontact printing, therefore, offers a large spectrum of potential variations.
To optimize the transfer of molecules from the stamp to the surface, it was proposed in the 1990s to use thiol chemistry on gold (a recent version of this protocol was recently released by Ostuni et al. ). This very efficient method became a standard in the field; however, it requires gold-covered substrates, which are rare among substrates of interest to biologists. In addition, it is not optimal for low-light live-cell fluorescent microscopy. Direct microcontact printing on regular cell culture substrates is a relatively simple and versatile alternative method. A variety of surface treatments can be applied to the regions of the substrate that should repel cells or protein regions. A variety of other treatments can be used to optimally bind cell adhesion molecules. Options include simple adsorption, covalent binding, electrostatic interactions and hydrophobic/hydrophilic interactions. These choices will be guided by the types of cells used (and consequently the type of adhesion molecule used), the size of the patterns, and the time during which cells should be kept on the patterns. Some very simple techniques (e.g., direct patterning on bare glass without any backfilling with repellent molecule) will work well with cells that do not bind on bare glass and do not pull too strongly on their adhesion molecules. For other cells, very good repellent molecules should be used, and very strong binding of the adhesion molecules to the substrate is required. For a discussion of some of these issues, see Fink et al. (2007). Direct microcontact printing works with many cell types, keeping them confined for several days (although not weeks). PLL-g-PEG is a cell/protein-repellent molecule that binds readily and with strong affinity to glass and activated polystyrene, by electrostatic interaction of poly-L-lysine chains.